The Social Prediction Community
Tags: genetics
Bookmark and Share
Ziibos (12)
fernandograu (18)
jbacon63 (5)
DMMc (8)
Homer (27)
ancienthart (36)
rubian (398)
will101 (206)
Guru (77)
more...
▼ advertisement
Challenge Your Friends
What is ZiiTrend?
Hiring Decisions based on Genetic Tests??
Raycer ( Score Rank: #232 based on predictions in the last 30 days ) Raycer  |  will close on 31-Dec-2008 (27 days from now)
In April 2008, the US Senate passed a bill that would bar employers and insurance providers from considering the results of a person's genetic tests when making hiring or coverage decisions. In the wake of the bill's passage, however, a number of people have questioned why it shouldn't be an employer's or insurer's right to make decisions based on genetics.

Any genetic policies will be extremely difficult to do well and, even if done properly, could still get things wrong. Will any US companies really ask for genetic tests in the hiring process?? Or will the new bill be over-thrown and outlawed?

inspired by: http://arstechnica.com/ne...
ZiiValue
(chance)
Possible Outcomes
20%
45%
35%
Predictions
Hide ▲
  • Zoom:
  • Current
  • 7d
  • 1m
  • 3m
  • 6m
  • 1y
  • 2y
News & Video
Add News / Video 1 - 4 of 57 news / videos
0 vote This is Good This is Bad
2008-12-01
A
BOTHELL, Wash.----Seattle Genetics, Inc. announced... (more)
0 vote This is Good This is Bad
2008-11-28
B
Vsthumb
Four genetic variations appear to determine the sp... (more)
0 vote This is Good This is Bad
2008-11-20
C
SAN MARINO, Calif.----Viral Genetics, Inc. , a bio... (more)
0 vote This is Good This is Bad
2008-11-14
D
Interleukin Genetics, Inc. today announced financi... (more)
Comments (7)
Add Comment
  1. ancienthart ancienthart 215 days ago
    + 2 votes This is Good This is Bad
    predicted: [ Most Likely ] [ 100% ] The bill will become outlawed.
    (more)
    Hmmm. Wish some extra options could be added. I'm gonna vote wholeheartedly for "effectively outlawed". The government will stick to it's guns about keeping the Bill - they can't afford not to, and no company will be "allowed" to require genetic tests.

    On the other hand, companies currently use such dubious things as personality tests, unpaid trial periods and entrant exams to determine an applicants "suitability". Is it really that much of a stretch to imagine them being interested in your genetic code.

    All we need is for a few people with a good genetic test casually adding it to their resume or mentioning it on the sly. It'll soon be just one of those things that you do during an interview: mention prior successes, dress nicely, but also to the level of work you seek, 4-page resume, casually mention your genetic preposition to loyalty ...
  2. rubian rubian 217 days ago
    0 vote This is Good This is Bad
    predicted: [ Most Likely ] [ 67% ] The bill will become outlawed.
    (more)
    isn't it against privacy!? or genetics-discrimination??
  3. Guru Guru 218 days ago
    + 1 vote This is Good This is Bad
    predicted: [ Most Likely ] [ 52% ] Yes, genetic tests required
    (more)
    Yeah, no secrets anymore. Even down to molecular level. This is sad, isn't it?
  4. Tony Tony 218 days ago
    + 1 vote This is Good This is Bad
    This remind me of the first episode of Futurama, in which Fry got his permanent "career chip" based on his DNA scan. That was good. I hope the future isn't like that.
    http://www.tv.com/futurama/show/249/e...
  5. black-shoulder black-shoulder 218 days ago
    + 1 vote This is Good This is Bad
    predicted: [ Most Likely ] [ 70% ] The bill will become outlawed.
    (more)
    I think this is a two-part question: an employer trying to get their hands on its potential applicants would trigger anti-privacy lawsuits, so I don't see how that would fly. However, an insurance company requiring information about an insurer's genetics is actually quite legitimate - many diseases have been known to be genetically-based, and a simple test can often reveal a person's risk of acquiring certain diseases. In light of that, I think there will be ways where insurance company can apply pressure, enough to "encourage" a customer to provide such info (e.g. charging substantially larger premiums for applicants refusing to provide genetic info). A bill that makes it a REQUIREMENT though is a stretch.
  6. goog goog 218 days ago
    0 vote This is Good This is Bad
    predicted: [ Most Likely ] [ 70% ] The bill will become outlawed.
    (more)
    I don't see a lot of companies care about genetic test results of its employees. If I'm an employer, I might be interested in the health condition of a candidate. That's about it.
  7. Raycer Raycer 218 days ago
    0 vote This is Good This is Bad
    predicted: [ Most Likely ] [ 84% ] No, no company cares
    (more)
    Most companies do not really care.
Add a Comment
Join us to comment on this prediction.
OR
Sign in if you are already an existing member.