Suggested Predictions
Ziibos (12)
|
In April 2008, the US Senate passed a bill that would bar employers and insurance providers from considering the results of a person's genetic tests when making hiring or coverage decisions. In the wake of the bill's passage, however, a number of people have questioned why it shouldn't be an employer's or insurer's right to make decisions based on genetics.
Any genetic policies will be extremely difficult to do well and, even if done properly, could still get things wrong. Will any US companies really ask for genetic tests in the hiring process?? Or will the new bill be over-thrown and outlawed? inspired by: http://arstechnica.com/ne...
Comments (7)
|
||||||



On the other hand, companies currently use such dubious things as personality tests, unpaid trial periods and entrant exams to determine an applicants "suitability". Is it really that much of a stretch to imagine them being interested in your genetic code.
All we need is for a few people with a good genetic test casually adding it to their resume or mentioning it on the sly. It'll soon be just one of those things that you do during an interview: mention prior successes, dress nicely, but also to the level of work you seek, 4-page resume, casually mention your genetic preposition to loyalty ...
http://www.tv.com/futurama/show/249/e...